Background: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) currently relies on biopsy of one or few embryo cells. Our aim was to evaluate the embryo extracellular matrices (spent medium and blastocoele fluid) as source of DNA for embryo genotyping. Results/methodology: We first evaluated the amplifiability and the amount of genomic DNA in spent embryo culture media from day 3 (n = 32) and day 5/6 (n = 54). Secondly, we evaluated the possibility to genotype the MTHFR polymorphism C677T from media at day 5/6 (n = 8) and blastocoele fluids (n = 9) by direct sequencing. The C677T polymorphism detection rate was 62.5 and 44.4% in medium and fluid, respectively. Conclusion: A noninvasive approach for embryo genotyping was possible, but still with limitations due to low detection rate and possible allele dropout.

Extracellular embryo genomic DNA and its potential for genotyping applications

GALLUZZI, LUCA;ANDREONI, FRANCESCA;DIOTALLEVI, AURORA;MAGNANI, MAURO
2015

Abstract

Background: Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) currently relies on biopsy of one or few embryo cells. Our aim was to evaluate the embryo extracellular matrices (spent medium and blastocoele fluid) as source of DNA for embryo genotyping. Results/methodology: We first evaluated the amplifiability and the amount of genomic DNA in spent embryo culture media from day 3 (n = 32) and day 5/6 (n = 54). Secondly, we evaluated the possibility to genotype the MTHFR polymorphism C677T from media at day 5/6 (n = 8) and blastocoele fluids (n = 9) by direct sequencing. The C677T polymorphism detection rate was 62.5 and 44.4% in medium and fluid, respectively. Conclusion: A noninvasive approach for embryo genotyping was possible, but still with limitations due to low detection rate and possible allele dropout.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2628301
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 42
social impact