The diffusion of mobile devices equipped with sensing, computation, and communication capabilities is opening unprecedented possibilities for high-resolution, spatio-temporal mapping of several phenomena. This novel data generation, collection, and processing paradigm, termed crowdsensing, lays upon complex, distributed cyberphysical systems. Collective data gathering from heterogeneous, spatially distributed devices inherently raises the question of how to manage different quality levels of contributed data. In order to extract meaningful information, it is, therefore, desirable to the introduction of effective methods for evaluating the quality of data. In this paper, we propose an approach aimed at systematic accuracy estimation of quantities provided by end-user devices of a crowd-based sensing system. This is obtained thanks to the combination of statistical bootstrap with uncertainty propagation techniques, leading to a consistent and technically sound methodology. Uncertainty propagation provides a formal framework for combining uncertainties, resulting from different quantities influencing a given measurement activity. Statistical bootstrap enables the characterization of the sampling distribution of a given statistics without any prior assumption on the type of statistical distributions behind the data generation process. The proposed approach is evaluated on synthetic benchmarks and on a real world case study. Cross-validation experiments show that confidence intervals computed by means of the presented technique show a maximum 1.5% variation with respect to interval widths computed by means of controlled standard Monte Carlo methods, under a wide range of operating conditions. In general, experimental results confirm the suitability and validity of the introduced methodology.

Bootstrap based Uncertainty Propagation for Data Quality Estimation in Crowdsensing Systems

FRESCHI, VALERIO;DELPRIORI, SAVERIO;LATTANZI, EMANUELE;BOGLIOLO, ALESSANDRO
2017

Abstract

The diffusion of mobile devices equipped with sensing, computation, and communication capabilities is opening unprecedented possibilities for high-resolution, spatio-temporal mapping of several phenomena. This novel data generation, collection, and processing paradigm, termed crowdsensing, lays upon complex, distributed cyberphysical systems. Collective data gathering from heterogeneous, spatially distributed devices inherently raises the question of how to manage different quality levels of contributed data. In order to extract meaningful information, it is, therefore, desirable to the introduction of effective methods for evaluating the quality of data. In this paper, we propose an approach aimed at systematic accuracy estimation of quantities provided by end-user devices of a crowd-based sensing system. This is obtained thanks to the combination of statistical bootstrap with uncertainty propagation techniques, leading to a consistent and technically sound methodology. Uncertainty propagation provides a formal framework for combining uncertainties, resulting from different quantities influencing a given measurement activity. Statistical bootstrap enables the characterization of the sampling distribution of a given statistics without any prior assumption on the type of statistical distributions behind the data generation process. The proposed approach is evaluated on synthetic benchmarks and on a real world case study. Cross-validation experiments show that confidence intervals computed by means of the presented technique show a maximum 1.5% variation with respect to interval widths computed by means of controlled standard Monte Carlo methods, under a wide range of operating conditions. In general, experimental results confirm the suitability and validity of the introduced methodology.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2641872
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 19
social impact