Abstract Harrigan and Spekkens (Found Phys 40:125–157, 2010), introduced the infuential notion of an ontological model of operational quantum theory. Ontological models can be either “epistemic” or “ontic.” According to the two scholars, Einstein would have been one of the frst to propose an epistemic interpretation of quantum mechanics. Pusey et al. (Nat Phys 8:475–478, 2012) showed that an epistemic interpretation of quantum theory is impossible, so implying that Einstein had been refuted. We discuss in detail Einstein’s arguments against the standard interpretation of QM, proving that there is a misunderstanding in Harrigan and Spekkens’ attribution of an epistemic perspective to Einstein, whose point of view was actually statistical, but in a quasi-classical sense
Is Einstein’s Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Ψ-Epistemic?
Fano, Vincenzo;Macchia, Giovanni;Tarozzi, Gino
2018
Abstract
Abstract Harrigan and Spekkens (Found Phys 40:125–157, 2010), introduced the infuential notion of an ontological model of operational quantum theory. Ontological models can be either “epistemic” or “ontic.” According to the two scholars, Einstein would have been one of the frst to propose an epistemic interpretation of quantum mechanics. Pusey et al. (Nat Phys 8:475–478, 2012) showed that an epistemic interpretation of quantum theory is impossible, so implying that Einstein had been refuted. We discuss in detail Einstein’s arguments against the standard interpretation of QM, proving that there is a misunderstanding in Harrigan and Spekkens’ attribution of an epistemic perspective to Einstein, whose point of view was actually statistical, but in a quasi-classical senseFile | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
EINSTEIN-HS.pdf
solo utenti autorizzati
Descrizione: Testo pubblicato
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
803.69 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
803.69 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.