Working memory updating: Load and binding.

In the present study, we aimed to examine how specific objects are updated in working memory. We compared conditions in which contents or content-context bindings from working memory were both encoded and updated (Experiment 1). In addition, for bindings, wemanipulated thememory load (i.e., number of contents) to maintain during updating. Results indicated that memory load did not specifically affect the process; rather, the content-context binding (vs. single contents) was critical in determining the increase in response latencies. Resultswere replicated even in Experiment 2, in which we manipulated the spatial locations of the to-be-recognized probes. Results showed evidence of a potential dissociation between updating of memory contentsonly and content-context bindings. In addition, memory load and spatial coherence between phases and probe recognition did not interact with updating performance.Overall, resultswere taken as a contribution towardmapping the complex nature of the updating mechanism