After some remarks on marginal signs of Liber glossarum, it is dealt with textual problems reserved by gloss AU 301 Auratis cornibus: querquos (?) dixit aura plenos, id est rorulentos where it comes into view an embarassing querquos dixit, without correspondence in the source, in Schol. Bern. ad G. 1, 217. If we consider that this voice appears identical – however without the uncertain reference to the oaks – in the previous AU 300,we think about an accidental corruption happened during the first part of making and transmission of the Liber, supposing, as a consequence, that identity with the first term of lemma could have encouraged the scribe to write in AU 301 the same text of the previous gloss. Supposing that this hypothesis is true and thanks to comparisons offered by other glossaries, a quite likely reconstruction may well be suggested about the original text situation.
In margine alla glossa AU 301 del Liber glossarum
Michele De Lazzer
2017
Abstract
After some remarks on marginal signs of Liber glossarum, it is dealt with textual problems reserved by gloss AU 301 Auratis cornibus: querquos (?) dixit aura plenos, id est rorulentos where it comes into view an embarassing querquos dixit, without correspondence in the source, in Schol. Bern. ad G. 1, 217. If we consider that this voice appears identical – however without the uncertain reference to the oaks – in the previous AU 300,we think about an accidental corruption happened during the first part of making and transmission of the Liber, supposing, as a consequence, that identity with the first term of lemma could have encouraged the scribe to write in AU 301 the same text of the previous gloss. Supposing that this hypothesis is true and thanks to comparisons offered by other glossaries, a quite likely reconstruction may well be suggested about the original text situation.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
