This paper builds on previous literature on corporate governance and sustainability by studying the relation between the adoption of Multiple Voting Shares (MVS) and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance. More specifically, it hypothesizes that controlled companies with MVS have lower sustainability performance than controlled companies without MVS because of different shareholders incentives. We rely on a proprietary dataset that includes 1,940 firm-year observations from 11 European countries, between 2016 and 2018 and we conduct multivariate analyses. To account for endogeneity and to further strengthen the results, we performed a difference-indifferences (diff-in-diff) analysis. We find that companies controlled by a dominant shareholder through MVS have lower sustainability performance compared to controlled companies without MVS.
Do deviations from shareholder democracy harm sustainability An empirical analysis of multiple voting shares in Europe
Bagarotto Ernesto Marco;
2021
Abstract
This paper builds on previous literature on corporate governance and sustainability by studying the relation between the adoption of Multiple Voting Shares (MVS) and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Performance. More specifically, it hypothesizes that controlled companies with MVS have lower sustainability performance than controlled companies without MVS because of different shareholders incentives. We rely on a proprietary dataset that includes 1,940 firm-year observations from 11 European countries, between 2016 and 2018 and we conduct multivariate analyses. To account for endogeneity and to further strengthen the results, we performed a difference-indifferences (diff-in-diff) analysis. We find that companies controlled by a dominant shareholder through MVS have lower sustainability performance compared to controlled companies without MVS.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
