Hegel and Rawls seem to be two scarcely compatible authors, the first being a critic of the social contract and of Kantian morality, the second being a neocontractualist and a reassertor of Kantian moral constructivism; the former being a speculative philosopher, the latter being an analytically trained philosopher. The first impression, however, can be misleading and the reading of Rawls’s works reveal an interest and a respect for Hegel as one would not have imagined: Hegel as a philosopher of reconciliation and the social rootedness of morality. With what reliability, on the theoretical and historical level, remains at least in part to be established.
Hegel e Rawls
Bonacina
2021
Abstract
Hegel and Rawls seem to be two scarcely compatible authors, the first being a critic of the social contract and of Kantian morality, the second being a neocontractualist and a reassertor of Kantian moral constructivism; the former being a speculative philosopher, the latter being an analytically trained philosopher. The first impression, however, can be misleading and the reading of Rawls’s works reveal an interest and a respect for Hegel as one would not have imagined: Hegel as a philosopher of reconciliation and the social rootedness of morality. With what reliability, on the theoretical and historical level, remains at least in part to be established.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.