Hegel and Rawls seem to be two scarcely compatible authors, the first being a critic of the social contract and of Kantian morality, the second being a neocontractualist and a reassertor of Kantian moral constructivism; the former being a speculative philosopher, the latter being an analytically trained philosopher. The first impression, however, can be misleading and the reading of Rawls’s works reveal an interest and a respect for Hegel as one would not have imagined: Hegel as a philosopher of reconciliation and the social rootedness of morality. With what reliability, on the theoretical and historical level, remains at least in part to be established.

Hegel e Rawls

Bonacina
2021

Abstract

Hegel and Rawls seem to be two scarcely compatible authors, the first being a critic of the social contract and of Kantian morality, the second being a neocontractualist and a reassertor of Kantian moral constructivism; the former being a speculative philosopher, the latter being an analytically trained philosopher. The first impression, however, can be misleading and the reading of Rawls’s works reveal an interest and a respect for Hegel as one would not have imagined: Hegel as a philosopher of reconciliation and the social rootedness of morality. With what reliability, on the theoretical and historical level, remains at least in part to be established.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2695929
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact