Lexical Similarity (LS) between two languages uncovers many interesting linguistic insights such as phylogenetic relationship, mutual intelligibility, common etymology, and loan words. There are various methods through which LS is evaluated. This paper presents a method of Phonetic Edit Distance (PED) that uses a soft comparison of letters using the articulatory features associated with their International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) transcription. In particular, the comparison between the articulatory features of two letters taken from words belonging to different languages is used to compute the cost of replacement in the inner loop of edit distance computation. As an example, PED gives edit distance of 0.82 between German word ‘vater’ ([fa:tər]) and Persian word ‘ ’ ([pedær]), meaning ‘father,’ and, similarly, PED of 0.93 between Hebrew word ‘ ’ ([ʃəɭam]) and Arabic word ‘ ’ ([səɭa:m], meaning ‘peace,’ whereas classical edit distances would be 4 and 2, respectively. We report the results of systematic experiments conducted on six languages: Arabic, Hindi, Marathi, Persian, Sanskrit, and Urdu. Universal Dependencies (UD) corpora were used to restrict the comparison to lists of words belonging to the same part of speech. The LS based on the average PED between pair of words was then computed for each pair of languages, unveiling similarities otherwise masked by the adoption of different alphabets, grammars, and pronunciations rules.

Discovering Lexical Similarity Using Articulatory Feature-Based Phonetic Edit Distance

Muhammad Suffian
;
Alessandro Bogliolo
2022

Abstract

Lexical Similarity (LS) between two languages uncovers many interesting linguistic insights such as phylogenetic relationship, mutual intelligibility, common etymology, and loan words. There are various methods through which LS is evaluated. This paper presents a method of Phonetic Edit Distance (PED) that uses a soft comparison of letters using the articulatory features associated with their International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) transcription. In particular, the comparison between the articulatory features of two letters taken from words belonging to different languages is used to compute the cost of replacement in the inner loop of edit distance computation. As an example, PED gives edit distance of 0.82 between German word ‘vater’ ([fa:tər]) and Persian word ‘ ’ ([pedær]), meaning ‘father,’ and, similarly, PED of 0.93 between Hebrew word ‘ ’ ([ʃəɭam]) and Arabic word ‘ ’ ([səɭa:m], meaning ‘peace,’ whereas classical edit distances would be 4 and 2, respectively. We report the results of systematic experiments conducted on six languages: Arabic, Hindi, Marathi, Persian, Sanskrit, and Urdu. Universal Dependencies (UD) corpora were used to restrict the comparison to lists of words belonging to the same part of speech. The LS based on the average PED between pair of words was then computed for each pair of languages, unveiling similarities otherwise masked by the adoption of different alphabets, grammars, and pronunciations rules.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2698010
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact