This essay analyzes the term Geta, as evidenced by the manuscript tradition in verse 577 of Plautus’ Truculentus, opposed to the proper name Cyamus found in vv. 583, 586 and 702. Status quaestionis, metrical problems, textual layout and possible dramaturgical devices will be discussed.

Tra rubrica e testo: Cyamus seruus Geta

caterina pentericci
2022

Abstract

This essay analyzes the term Geta, as evidenced by the manuscript tradition in verse 577 of Plautus’ Truculentus, opposed to the proper name Cyamus found in vv. 583, 586 and 702. Status quaestionis, metrical problems, textual layout and possible dramaturgical devices will be discussed.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2744674
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact