Enrico Prampolini is now widely recognized as an Italian Futurist with a strong European orientation. A pivotal moment in Prampolini’s career was his en- gagement with International Constructivism. His presence in key European cultu- ral centres such as Prague, Dresden, Berlin and Düsseldorf infused new vitality into what would later become known as secondo futurismo. Through his interna- tional involvement, Prampolini provided the movement with fresh theoretical and aesthetic input, enabling it to re-emerge powerfully after 1922. This essay offers a critical analysis of Prampolini’s interactions with international avant-garde artists and movements that shaped his engagement with abstraction, mechanical art, and emerging theories and technologies in stage design. It traces three decisive moments in Prampolini’s artistic career. The first part examines the connections he established, between 1920 and 1922, with the November Group, Section d’Or and De Stijl. Using unpublished and recently discovered documents, the second part analyses Prampolini’s presence in Prague and Berlin, at the Bauhaus in Wei- mar and the Düsseldorf Congress of the Union of International Progressive Artists as well as his subsequent involvement with International Constructivism, in par- ticular concerning new technologies in stage design. The final part analyses how this complex relationship between artists and theories affested Prampolini’s gen- eral thoughts on Constructivism, as can be seen in his notes for a never-published History of Abstract Art (1949).

Enrico Prampolini and International Constructivism

Carlotta castellani
In corso di stampa

Abstract

Enrico Prampolini is now widely recognized as an Italian Futurist with a strong European orientation. A pivotal moment in Prampolini’s career was his en- gagement with International Constructivism. His presence in key European cultu- ral centres such as Prague, Dresden, Berlin and Düsseldorf infused new vitality into what would later become known as secondo futurismo. Through his interna- tional involvement, Prampolini provided the movement with fresh theoretical and aesthetic input, enabling it to re-emerge powerfully after 1922. This essay offers a critical analysis of Prampolini’s interactions with international avant-garde artists and movements that shaped his engagement with abstraction, mechanical art, and emerging theories and technologies in stage design. It traces three decisive moments in Prampolini’s artistic career. The first part examines the connections he established, between 1920 and 1922, with the November Group, Section d’Or and De Stijl. Using unpublished and recently discovered documents, the second part analyses Prampolini’s presence in Prague and Berlin, at the Bauhaus in Wei- mar and the Düsseldorf Congress of the Union of International Progressive Artists as well as his subsequent involvement with International Constructivism, in par- ticular concerning new technologies in stage design. The final part analyses how this complex relationship between artists and theories affested Prampolini’s gen- eral thoughts on Constructivism, as can be seen in his notes for a never-published History of Abstract Art (1949).
In corso di stampa
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2773371
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact