Background Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a chronic condition frequently characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. While cyclic rifaximin is commonly used for symptom control, interest is growing in the potential role of probiotics. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with SUDD treated with either Clostridium butyricum CBM588® or cyclic rifaximin over a 12-month period. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 70 patients with a conirmed diagnosis of SUDD, treated between 2023 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment received: Group A (CBM588® daily for 12 months) and Group B (cyclic rifaximin 400 mg bid for 7 days per month). Clinical data, symptom proiles, and occurrence of diverticulitis were collected and compared. The primary outcome was the reduction of SUDD-related symptoms, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of acute diverticulitis episodes during follow-up. Results A total of 56 patients completed the 12-month follow-up (31 in Group A, 25 in Group B). No signiicant diference was observed in the rate of symptomatic lares between groups (19.4% vs. 20%, p = 0.7). However, a signiicantly higher proportion of patients in the CBM588 ® group reported adequate symptom relief (77.4% vs. 44%, p = 0.02). Improvements in bloating and tenesmus were more frequent in the CBM588 ® group, although not statistically signiicant. No treatmentrelated adverse events were recorded. Conclusion In this retrospective comparison, Clostridium butyricum CBM588 ® demonstrated similar eicacy to rifaximin in preventing diverticulitis, with a potential advantage in subjective symptom improvement. These indings support further prospective studies to explore the role of CBM588 ® in SUDD management.
Management of symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) of the colon with Clostridium butyricum CBM588 versus rifaximin: a retrospective cross-sectional study
Bertuccioli, Alexander;Sisti, Davide;
2025
Abstract
Background Symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (SUDD) is a chronic condition frequently characterized by abdominal pain, bloating, and altered bowel habits. While cyclic rifaximin is commonly used for symptom control, interest is growing in the potential role of probiotics. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with SUDD treated with either Clostridium butyricum CBM588® or cyclic rifaximin over a 12-month period. Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 70 patients with a conirmed diagnosis of SUDD, treated between 2023 and 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on treatment received: Group A (CBM588® daily for 12 months) and Group B (cyclic rifaximin 400 mg bid for 7 days per month). Clinical data, symptom proiles, and occurrence of diverticulitis were collected and compared. The primary outcome was the reduction of SUDD-related symptoms, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of acute diverticulitis episodes during follow-up. Results A total of 56 patients completed the 12-month follow-up (31 in Group A, 25 in Group B). No signiicant diference was observed in the rate of symptomatic lares between groups (19.4% vs. 20%, p = 0.7). However, a signiicantly higher proportion of patients in the CBM588 ® group reported adequate symptom relief (77.4% vs. 44%, p = 0.02). Improvements in bloating and tenesmus were more frequent in the CBM588 ® group, although not statistically signiicant. No treatmentrelated adverse events were recorded. Conclusion In this retrospective comparison, Clostridium butyricum CBM588 ® demonstrated similar eicacy to rifaximin in preventing diverticulitis, with a potential advantage in subjective symptom improvement. These indings support further prospective studies to explore the role of CBM588 ® in SUDD management.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2025 Urgesi et al. Butirrisan.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


