Using an approach, inspired by our modernisation of Lemoine’s Geometrography, this paper proposes a new readability criterion for formal proofs produced by automated theorem provers for geometry. We analyse two criteria to measure the readability of a proof: the criterion given by Chou et al. and the one given by Wiedijk. After discussing the limitations of these two criteria, we introduce a novel approach, which provides a new criterion. We conclude discussing some future work.
Measuring the Readability of Geometric Proofs: The Area Method Case.
Pedro Quaresma
;Pierluigi Graziani
2023
Abstract
Using an approach, inspired by our modernisation of Lemoine’s Geometrography, this paper proposes a new readability criterion for formal proofs produced by automated theorem provers for geometry. We analyse two criteria to measure the readability of a proof: the criterion given by Chou et al. and the one given by Wiedijk. After discussing the limitations of these two criteria, we introduce a novel approach, which provides a new criterion. We conclude discussing some future work.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Quaresma_Graziani JAR paper.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
679.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
679.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.