We consider the dynamics of asset prices and wealth in an exchange economy with long-lived assets where agents adopt different portfolio strategies: one agent allocates wealth according to the Constant Weight Strategy while the other follows a Portfolio Insurance Strategy. In a Lucas’ tree setting, assuming a binomial model for the dividend process, we provide conditions for survival and (relative) dominance of agents and discuss them in terms of the expected log-return of the risky asset. Both strategies survive for low expected log-returns, while both strategies dominate, but on different paths, for high expected log- returns. We show that the portfolio insurance strategy plays a stabilizing effect on the market volatility.

Portfolio insurers and constant weight traders: who will survive?

Grassetti, Francesca
2021

Abstract

We consider the dynamics of asset prices and wealth in an exchange economy with long-lived assets where agents adopt different portfolio strategies: one agent allocates wealth according to the Constant Weight Strategy while the other follows a Portfolio Insurance Strategy. In a Lucas’ tree setting, assuming a binomial model for the dividend process, we provide conditions for survival and (relative) dominance of agents and discuss them in terms of the expected log-return of the risky asset. Both strategies survive for low expected log-returns, while both strategies dominate, but on different paths, for high expected log- returns. We show that the portfolio insurance strategy plays a stabilizing effect on the market volatility.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BDG_QF_21.pdf

solo utenti autorizzati

Tipologia: Versione editoriale
Licenza: Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione 1.85 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.85 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11576/2733662
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact